A poster session that brings together graduate students, postdocs, recruiters, faculty and fellow candidates. National Meeting and Exposition March April 4, Register now to get the latest research, network with your peers and find . "With the Academic Employment Initiative, we're trying to change that picture an AEI poster session at the August national meeting in Philadelphia. While candidates present their research in the informal setting of Sci-Mix. 6 Poster Session: Meet the Faculty Candidate. Sunday, November 16, PM. Galleria Exhibit Hall (Hilton Atlanta). Description: This is the annual poster.
As recent studies by Valerie J. The process has proven discouraging to many young women, minorities, and candidates from less prestigious universities. In an effort to broaden the recruitment process and make it more inclusive, AEI is looking to the model used by the Modern Language Association and other professional groups in the humanities and social sciences. At those organizations' annual meetings, prospective faculty members meet face-to-face with representatives from departments looking to hire new staff.
For jobs in industry, ACS itself has long facilitated such interchanges through NECH, the on-site employment center run at national meetings by the society's Department of Career Services.
But the academic chemistry community traditionally doesn't take part, noted Jura N. Viesulas, the department's manager of employment services. The timing is set to coincide with the start of the academic recruitment season in the fall.
While candidates present their research in the informal setting of Sci-Mix, the popular interdisciplinary evening session, they can talk one-on-one with chemistry department representatives. At last month's AEI session on recruiting faculty in Anaheim, four senior faculty members and four more recently hired chemistry professors described how the hiring process currently works.
The panel members on the hiring side of the equation-- Isiah M. Bushey of Trinity University, San Antonio--all had similar stories to tell.
They stressed that their institutions look for evidence of an excellent teaching and research record, conference presentations, journal publications, the ability to solicit external funds, and the potential for a candidate's research to attract students.
Warner advised that grad students not wait until near the end of their Ph. Presentations at scientific meetings give young scientists a chance to meet established faculty as well as to get important feedback on their work. McLendon, who soon will be moving to Duke University to become Duke's dean of arts and sciences, acknowledged that a candidate's pedigree is a significant factor in making the first cut.
How to Get a Professor Job in the USA
Places that don't pay attention to that will do so at their own peril. Although he later explained that he meant his statement literally, given that he had met the women in question, the remark struck many people at the session as insensitive. They had been through the hiring process recently enough that the experience was still fresh, yet each had also served on search committees for their current departments.
They underscored the need for candidates to begin early in their careers to identify their own goals and to meet as many members of the chemical community as possible.
Among the ways to network she suggested was for grad students and postdocs to get involved in their institutions' seminar programs. So you have to make important things catch our attention! On one resume I saw someone put the paper numbers on the left, and the impact factor on the right hand side of each publication. I thought that was pretty nifty.
Some people manage to squeeze the covers of the journals, if their publication made the cover. I think thats great, if you can format everything neatly. Also, make your last name bold, so we can see whether you were first or not. This makes things much easier for me. I wouldn't bother putting these in, but if you feel the need to, be a good sport and make a separate section. Don't try to pad overall list using these. It is misleading on your part, and annoying for me to subtract them out.
Special Sessions: 56th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC )
We care to see just what has been published or accepted. And, in any case, its not so much about the number of publications. But this is not so. In fact, more postdocs makes you look less desirable.
Your goal is to sell your "stock" at the peak of its price around the 3rd or 4th year of your 1st postdoc. So a common mistake I see people doing is putting the brief postdoc immediately after their graduation on their resume.
You know, the one where your PhD boss kept you there an extra months while you were looking for a job, just cuz he is nice like that and also wanted to get more results out of you? The committee wants to see your potential to bring in money. Therefore, in your research plan you should be trying to convince them that: The short term ideas should be almost ready to go out to the grant-funding agency i.
You don't have to get into the gory details, since the reader is most likely not in your field, and is just trying to get an idea for what to expect from you. You could also mention potential collaborations within the department, or within the university to which you are applying another place for this is the cover letter. Keep in mind that the initial scan of your research plan is only going to take 30 seconds or so!
Some common research statement mistakes I see over and over the less you annoy the reviewer, the better your chances: That's great, but I want to know whether you can function with the umbilical cord cut. But rather you should first establish importance e.
Obviously, I am exaggerating, but you get the idea. Section titles should be descriptive too. Often I read a proposal and, by the of it, i still have no idea why or what they are trying to do. It is up to you to establish importance, and to make your work easy to understand.
Some people just kind of tell me that they plan to rid the world of cancer, but don't tell me HOW they are planning to do that exactly No, you are not a snake-oil salesman, so avoid sounding like one.
You have to lay out a detailed, coherent plan about: Moreover, you need to tell me how you are going to get money to make this happen see below. When you go the extra step and think things through deeper, it sets you apart. It also shows that you know what you are doing. List which programs within that agency, which particular grant types, who is the program officer and have you discussed your work with them?
I know that YOU know. But I can't read your mind. It means you are not a good proposal-writer ie, you won't be able to fund your research after we hire you. This is an automatic disqualification. If we are going to invest over a million bucks into you add up your salary, student support for a few years until you start bringing money in, your start-up, etc and you will come up with such a big numberyou better not be careless.
Typically, your research statements do not conform with university expectations.
How to Get a Professor Job in the USA
The proposals I've seen are too short, and the projects are too superficial. Funding plan is often missing entirely. It is not the most important part of your packet, but it is a necessary one. So here is how I would structure it: Describe your previous teaching experience, whether it was TA, volunteering in a high school, or even tutoring your friends!
Tell us how much you enjoy teaching and about any kind of interesting experiences you may have had that motivated you to become a teacher. When I was a Ph. Also I had a teaching fellowship through NSF where I helped a high-school teacher lecture 9th grade science in a rural area in parallel had to take a teaching course at my university, and put together a teaching portfolio.
Finally, I tutored a student pro-bono for her Russian class.