He did, once on the show & twice in the book. Season/Book 2 spoilers It wasn't just for fun though. Mel & Ham Stannis got it on as part of a. The two primary reasons why readers assume that Stannis is unnaturally cold or uninterested in sex are his cold marriage/ relationship with his. In the middle of the war, we see Melisandre seducing Stannis into having sex with her, then she gives birth to a "shadow demon" or popularly known as " Demon.
Or maybe Stannis was just naturally asexual; some people are. Both of these are flukes. However, when the beautiful Melisandre rather than the ugly Selyse is the one touching Stannis, Stannis is shown to react differently—he is just fine with Mel touching him.
However, moments later, Davos notes the following: There is no sacrifice more precious. The Red Woman was all that Selyse was not; young, full-bodied, and strangely beautiful, with her heart shaped face, coppery hair, and unearthly red eyes.
On top of the rather obvious trinity of heterosexuality, homosexuality, and asexuality, they also represent different approaches men take regarding sexual love and lust.
The Relationships Of Stannis Baratheon Pt 1 | Thrones Amino
Robert is the stereotypical playboy, sleeping with dozens of women and then forgetting about them the next morning. Renly is the romantic, devoting himself completely to a single lover, sexually and emotionally. Stannis is the stoic, unable to feel romantic love or even basic sexual lust at all.
House Baratheon's sigil is a clear symbol of masculinity, and the three Baratheon brothers seem to represent the different forms that masculinity can take. Secondly there is the argument that Stannis must be asexual because he acts asexual— i. Deepwood is a motte-and-bailey castle in the midst of thick forest, easy to creep up on unawares. A wooden castle, defended by an earthen dike and a palisade of logs. The going will be slower through the mountains, admittedly, but up there your host can move unseen, to emerge almost at the gates of Deepwood.
Good men and true will fight for Joffrey, wrongly believing him the true king. A northman might even say the same of Robb Stark. They turned their backs on their rightful king for no better reason than dreams of power and glory, and I have marked them for what they are.Game of Thrones - Stannis x Melisandre - "Ash"
In this, we see both good and bad intent, as well as both good and bad outcomes. Moreover, we see Stannis approaching something resembling utilitarianism in matters of both justice and morality. But when his brother, Robert, rose in rebellion against the crown, Stannis was faced with a difficult moral choice. If you only knew… that was a hard choosing. My blood or my liege. My brother or my king. If he chose his brother over the king, he would violate his oath of loyalty to the crown.
It was the true definition of a dilemma, but, in the end, of course, Stannis chose his brother over his king. I think the answer comes down to justice versus injustice. Aerys II Targaryen was wildly unjust and lawless.
He raped his wife numerous times, murdered Rickard and Brandon Stark, and revealed himself to be a man unwilling to adhere to any law — in short, he showed himself unfit for the office. For a man like Stannis, the injustice and lawlessness that Aerys displayed likely was the turning point for why he chose Robert. If this theory does turn out to be the case, it shows Stannis as exhibiting early hallmarks of being an enlightenment thinker, placing the king under law. When the stormlander and some Reacher lords swore fealty to Stannis, he was well within both his rights and his view of treason to execute them.
Instead, he pardoned them. However, he goes a step further in saying that he forgave their treachery, which goes beyond the political and military reality and lands squarely on a flexible sense of ethics. But Stannis did something that required him to forgo rigidity: But the fact remained to Stannis: This was something that Stannis came to recognize over the course of the books. The biggest stumbling block to winning more swords was the issue of religion. Were they treated unequally?
Davos Seaworth was elevated to Handship, despite his renewed adherence to the Faith of the Seven.
In this, we find a strongly tolerant vision of faiths. Stannis was convinced that the Lord of Light was the one true God, but he was unwilling to force his belief on others. He promoted adherents of any religion who proved themselves useful, such as Davos, and demoted those who proved useless, such as Alester Florent. And this religious toleration as a means of policy also extended to the old gods of the north.
Stannis could have attempted to force a new religion on the northmen, but he resisted that impulse in two key ways. First, he decided to leave Melisandre at Castle Black instead of taking her on campaign with him in the north. Still, his political astuteness in dealing delicately with the faiths of his would-be subjects is yet another example of his adaptability and inventiveness — the exact opposite qualities of mindless rigidity.
It is time we made alliance against our common foe. And to be fair to this viewpoint, he does himself no favors through his brusque speech and demeanor. However, when examined closely, he shows a less-than-iron-willed approach to diplomacy.
In A Clash of Kings and early in A Storm of Swords, his approach to diplomacy is one where he demands fealty in exchange for pardons. When Renly died, Stannis sent envoys to the Tyrells demanding their fealty in exchange for clemency for their treason. Following the death of Robb Stark and Balon Greyjoy, Stannis grudgingly decided to offer pardons to the Iron Islands and the north in exchange for their loyalty.
The lions will devour them unless… Saan, I will require your fastest ships to carry envoys to the Iron islands and White Harbor. I shall offer pardons.
Iron Bends: The Surprising Flexibility of Stannis Baratheon | Wars and Politics of Ice and Fire
However, by the end of that novel, we start to see his thinking evolving considerably though not fully. Jon Snow was the confirmed bastard son of Eddard Stark, and, as a bastard, he could not inherit Winterfell without a royal legitimization.
But Stannis desired a unifying source for his attempts to marshal the north, and Jon became the manifestation of that desire. As it turns out, this would not be the last time that he showed a diplomatic flexibility. When Stannis first attempts to recruit the northern lords in his cause by sending out murders of ravens, he was almost uniformly rejected; the Karstarks duplicitously declared for Stannis, but a number of houses, such as the Mormonts, declared they would never swear fealty to anyone whose name was not Stark, and scores more never even responded.
Homage might have been owed to Stannis by these houses and their lords, but his old approach of demanding their loyalty did not amend itself to receiving the pledges of fealty he desperately needed to win in the north. Fortunately for Stannis, however, he still had Jon Snow.
Lord Snow counseled Stannis to refrain from demanding fealty and instead offered a different idea for securing their loyalty: Your Grace will need to go to them yourself. The clans have not seen a king since Torrhen Stark bent his knee. Your coming does them honor.
He is no king of mine. Instead of begging or demanding, asking for help made it more possible for Stannis to win allies. And win them he did, as we find northern clansmen attacking the ironborn at Deepwood Motte at his side.
An important distinction to make here is that most of the northern houses and clans are fighting with Stannis not on behalf of his claim to the Iron Throne, but, rather, to rescue Arya Stark. The king has to be aware of this, and it has to grate on his pride considerably, but he nonetheless allows these men into his ranks and considers them some of his best soldiers in the north, giving them prestigious positions within his army.
Comparing Stannis to His Rivals: I had the cart before the horse.
I was trying to win the throne to save the kingdom, when I should have been trying to save the kingdom to win the throne. How does his pragmatism and adaptability match up against other claimants to the throne, and, more importantly, does it make him a better contender for the crown? Renly Baratheon Stannis is most often compared and contrasted with his brother, Renly — not only by readers, but also by Stannis himself. Renly was easygoing; Stannis is not.
Renly made friends easily; Stannis declared that kings have no friends, only subjects and enemies. In the parlay between the two from A Clash of Kings, we see two very different views of kingship.
Renly knew that Stannis had claim via royal inheritance, but he believed that the swords sworn to him gave him the right to be king. This underlies his flexible morality — which just may be flexible to the point of seeming amoral — which is on display time and again in the series: In this, he was doubly usurping the throne, both from Joffrey and from his brother.
Instead, he investigated whether Joffrey, Myrcella, and Tommen were, indeed, bastards. This is the key to understanding the difference between the two brothers: Renly would usurp the throne because he thought he would make a good king and nothing else.
Stannis would not make a claim unless he had evidence that would support it. Though Stannis called him a traitor and rebel, he and Robb possessed some key similarities — but also one fundamental difference. In this, Robb had the horse before the cart — he saved the soon-to-be kingdom first before gaining the crown.
In defeating Mance Rayder and the wildlings at Castle Black and then campaigning against both the ironmen at Deepwood Motte and the Boltons and Freys at Winterfell, Stannis was demonstrating value in defending the realm, and thereby demonstrating his value as a king, as well.
However, Robb Stark actually shows himself to be much more morally inflexible than Stannis. When Robb bedded Jeyne Westerling, he refused to simply dishonor her and move on; he married her instead, and, thus, started the sequence of events that brought his reign to a crashing, horrifying conclusion. And Stannis did flinch from the implication that he was guilty of murder, giving a particularly poor alibi when questioned by Davos.
However, his betrayal of his marriage vows — as well as the consequence of this betrayal — did not turn him aside from pursuing his claim to the Iron Throne. Daenerys Targaryen At the end of the War of the Five Kings, Stannis stood alone as the last living king of the original contenders.
Despite this minor victory, however, George R.