When Coleridge met Wordsworth - Telegraph
The antagonism is especially marked in the case of Wordsworth and about the relationship: "[Wordsworth] can get Coleridge to talk over his. Adam Sisman describes the exhilarating rise of a relationship the two poets referred to as “the Coleridge Was Wordsworth's Albatross. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth In a chance meeting that In this page, we will more deeply explore the relationship between these two.
Furthermore, the primary and secondary imagination is a concept that was unique to Coleridge, and although Wordsworth incorporated imagination into his poetry, he primarily called upon other sources of inspiration. In addition, he allows nature to influence the mood of his poetry in works such asTintern Abbey.
However, apart from differences in their poetic diction and the ways in which they derived poetic inspiration, the two poets also had different outlooks on religion. Especially in his later years, Coleridge concerned himself a great deal with God, religion and faith. Coleridge not only examined the Bible, but he also studied the Trinitarian view of Christianity along with the works of St. On the contrary, Wordsworth was an Anglican, as well as a pantheist.
Although he did focus on God through nature as a pantheist, Wordsworth differed from Coleridge in that he did emphasize religious symbolism.
- When Coleridge met Wordsworth
- What Did William Wordsworth Do to Samuel Taylor Coleridge?
The stress Coleridge placed on religion and God is ironic because this poem intended to address the strain on his relationship with Wordsworth. This poem addressed God and referenced religious anecdotes i.
Coleridge and Wordsworth
One would imagine that if Coleridge were addressing the problematic relationship he would use language that is partial to Wordsworth, and refrain from involving ideology different from that of Wordsworth.
On a very deep level, this may be an attempt by Coleridge to use juxtaposed concepts to convey his point. However, it is important to note that Coleridge integrated God into this poem. It displayed that even though he was concerned about his relations with Wordsworth, a very worthwhile topic, he felt that he could best address the situation by incorporating religious references.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge in Contrast to William Wordsworth
Wordsworth refrained from bringing God into the issue, but instead used a literary device to convey his sentiment. Wordsworth comments on the situation from a simple standpoint and does not involve God or a higher being; however, Coleridge makes the situation more intricate by involving God. On the surface, this is an example of Coleridge complicating things that Wordsworth deemed simple.
However, to truly understand why Coleridge involved God in his poem and why Wordsworth did not, one must understand how they each individually interpreted symbolism.
In contrast, he is looked inside himself but not inside his soul, while Coleridge asserted that man must look inside himself and it is there he will find inspiration in God. Whether their differences stemmed from religion, means of inspiration, or simply poetic diction, it is evident that these two poets were uniquely individual. Moreover, although Samuel Coleridge is often paired with William Wordsworth, upon further examination one can plainly see that the two poets are undoubtedly different.
The similarities between them often overshadow their individual achievements, ideas, and styles.
Combined with the fact that his opium addiction crippled his poetic potential, these elements portray Coleridge as less accomplished poet than Wordsworth. Regardless of popular opinion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge possessed his own unique poetic diction, sought non-traditional methods of poetic inspiration, conveyed original theories about the imagination, and distinctly incorporated his religious philosophies into his poetry.
It is for these reasons that Samuel Taylor Coleridge remains a pillar for the Romantic era of poetry. Wordsworth, who struggled to achieve this aim for the rest of his life, was flattered and the impossible terms of the friendship were set.
What happened next has become the stuff of literary legend. As they wandered over the Quantock Hills, the two men conceived of the Lyrical Ballads, a collection of poems, most of which were neither ballads nor lyrical, which would radically challenge the diet of jaded and ornate verse which was dulling the palates of the English reading public. These were poems written 'for men', as Wordsworth put it, in the language of men and their subject would be neither love nor religion but those people who were marginalised, disenfranchised and dispossessed.
When the Wordsworths moved to Grasmere, Coleridge followed suit, settling his family in nearby Keswick.
It was from Dove Cottage that the two men planned the second edition of Lyrical Ballads and the initial euphoria of their union began to fade. In a last-minute pronouncement, Wordsworth omitted Coleridge's dreamlike Christabel from the collection, replacing it with his own poem, Michael. Whether or not Coleridge supported this decision, the balance between them had shifted. From now on Wordsworth was in the ascendancy and Coleridge believed the poet in himself to be dead.
His marriage was failing, he had writer's block, and the quantity of opium he was consuming was making him ill. According to Jonathan Wordsworth, the only mistake made was by Montagu, for telling Coleridge what Wordsworth had written. It was a betrayal, regardless of whether the victim had knowledge of it.
What Did William Wordsworth Do to Samuel Taylor Coleridge?
Coleridge had been married, but the marriage, unsurprisingly, had broken down. The other contributing factor, according to Jonathan Wordsworth in his interview with Helien, was this: Visionary poetry was what Coleridge did best. Did Wordsworth Abandon Coleridge?
Indeed, were I an irritable man and an unthinking one, I should probably have considered myself as having been very unkindly used by him in this respect, for I was at one time confined for two months, and he never came to see me — me, who had ever paid such unremitting attention to him!
Coleridge was depressed and unproductive. Even here, the poet would find no haven. Image by Decoded Past. Wordsworth, on the other hand, was to propose to himself as his object, to give the charm of novelty to things of everyday.