Are the US and the UK bound to intervene in Ukraine?
Meantime Britain ties its policy on Ukraine to the success of reforms, and . EU and within the framework of collaboration between the USA and. Brexit has the potential to bring Ukraine and the UK closer than they have ever The repercussions of Britain leaving the European Union (EU) go well . The Redemption of British-American Special Intelligence Relationship. British neo-Nazis fighting in Ukraine are part of a wider scene. will not be enough, says the Ukrainian-American journalist Natalia Antonova. one another in meaningful ways, to establish horizontal ties that engage them.
Seeing British citizens willing to leave the EU challenged, and truly puzzled, many Ukrainians. For centuries the Ukrainian people have found themselves in the geographic conundrum between Europe and Eurasia. While Ukrainian history and culture speak in favour of it being a part of Europe, political realities and historic events have often separated it from other European states.
With this sentiment, Ukrainian citizens eagerly awaited the outcomes of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement negotiations in Being part of the European project appeals to many Ukrainians as something to aspire for—a statement of high er quality, quality of life, governance and values.Who Do Russians See As Their Enemies?
Hence, Brexit was seen as a fundamental challenge to the political institutions of the EU and a source of uncertainty and instability within the union of European nations. Despite the initial shock following the referendum, subsequent events have shown that Britain will remain a strong Ukrainian ally. The debate in political circles turned from a traditional self-victimisation narrative to a positive search for productive grounds for cooperation.
Suddenly, the Ukrainian political establishment tried to make Ukraine interesting for Britain, which did not go unnoticed. Prime Minister May met President Poroshenko for the first time in Aprilat a bilateral meeting to mark the 25th anniversary of the diplomatic ties between the two countries. Cooperation will continue in other areas.
Britain provided a training programme for soldiers inreaching up to inand members of Ukrainian Army inmore than previously agreed upon. British support to Ukraine was also reflected in the budget. Over the past few years Britain has expanded its programmes in Ukraine and now sponsors a variety of activities ranging from the funding of Stopfake. Moreover, Britain is an important ally in developing aircraft manufacturing in Ukraine, a sector of strategic importance for the struggling Ukrainian economy.
Back inthe two sides declared that their relations are strategic in a joint statement. Despite Brexit, Britain continues to pursue all these interests. So far it may be said that the interests of Ukraine and the United Kingdom are complementary ones.
A decisive, but backstage role Great Britain has always consistently supported the Euro-Atlantic and European integration of Ukraine. London favorably looked at the prospects of giving Ukraine the perspective of membership in the European Union in the future.
Please Consider Donating
The role of Britain was particularly tangible on EU-related issues ahead of the Vilnius summit inwhere the Association Agreement was planned to be signed. After the start for Russian aggression inthe British demonstrated their partnership responsibility towards Ukraine through active efforts in sanctioning Russia, providing assistance in the defense sector, supporting reform efforts.
Duringin its relations with Ukraine, the UK made the priority of promoting the Association Agreement, especially regarding a Free Trade Zone between Ukraine and EU, as the main mechanism for the transformation of Ukraine in accordance with British national interests, following the scenario used in Central and Eastern Europe in the s.
- Embassy of Ukraine to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Are the US and the UK bound to intervene in Ukraine?
- Ukraine profile - Timeline
This made the British side stand out, as such an interpretation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU was shared primarily by the Central European states former Soviet bloc countrieswhile other European states stressed that this Agreement should not create illusions about an EU membership perspective in Ukraine. Britain proved to be especially active during the most critical period of February in order to achieve an agreement between the parties of the crises in Kyiv.
The British government led by David Cameron adopted a position that it was the primary responsibility of the Ukrainian government to return the situation to a peaceful track.
Also, the UK was one of the initiators of sanctioning Ukrainian authorities at the EU level and actively coordinated its position with Germany and Poland, who were mediators in the dialogue between the Ukrainian government and Euromaidan protesters. Britain took part in this in a so-called backstage role: Rigid stance on Russia The Ukrainian-British relations in the environment of Russian aggression experienced a significant upswing.
The British Government is also actively working on the reaching of a consensus on this issue both within the EU and within the framework of collaboration between the USA and European countries. However, Ukraine is not entirely happy with this situation, believing that the UK could and should be more active, given commitments made in the framework of the Budapest Memorandum inand that the British Government could have done much more to block Russian assets, given the significant presence of Russian capital in Britain.
From Britain to Ukraine, the far right is thriving on shared emotion
On 2 Marchthe Ukrainian Parliament in its address to the Parliaments of these nations urged them to send observer missions to Ukraine as well as organize a group to negotiate with Russia.
Although many observers in Ukraine still pay attention to the untapped potential of the Budapest memorandum in the need for more active inclusion of the United Kingdom in the discussion process. By 2 Marchofficial London refused to participate in the preparations for the G8 summit in Sochi. Also, UK, in concert with the United States, began to promote the idea of the need to introduce sanctions against Russia. The result of this mutual work was a joint statement by the G7 countries about the events in Ukraine, which effectively excluded Russia from this informal international association.
Similarly, at a meeting of foreign ministers of EU Member States, the United Kingdom put the need to introduce sanctions against Russia in response to the aggression against Ukraine on the agenda.
Britain was becoming a country from an informal minority group in the EU which advocated for the most rigid stance on Moscow.
This step concerned 21 individuals and had been approved by the EU on the very same day. However, London does not distance itself from the settlement process — it insists on tougher sanctions against Russia. On 18 Novemberthe British Government announced the decision to transfer 10 armored vehicles with the appropriate communication equipment to the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission and its willingness to increase the number of British members of the Mission.
The pledge to transfer the promised equipment was fulfilled on 13 January Ukrainian reforms facilitator Britain had been active in providing support for Ukrainian reforms, and this process intensified after the Euromaidan revolution.
British politicians considered that only through effective internal reform Ukraine will be able to solve its problems of structural weaknesses, through which Russian aggression was largely made possible.